2016-06-15 Meeting Agenda / Notes
Date
Jun 15, 2016
Attendees
@Former user (Deleted)
@Former user (Deleted)
@Former user (Deleted)
@Former user (Deleted)
@Former user (Deleted)
@Former user (Deleted)
@Johan Sandersson
@Peter Monks
@Former user (Deleted)
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
5min | Update on Open Source Process | @Former user (Deleted) |
|
| Discuss initial tasks for standardizing Container interface | All | Suggested Tasks to assign
|
Notes
Open Source Process
Foundation has a blanket agreement from Symphony (incl. Minuet)
There are some issues with the contribution (e.g. DLLs from Chromium) which require Symphony and GS to adjust legal docs to exclude these 3rd party items
Expect Symphony to close by tomorrow, GS to provide feedback from lawyers
Standardizing Interface
Rather than starting new work Dov suggested that we all find any prior comparisons done by our respective firms and contribute the output. See actions below.
Action items
Comments
@Former user (Deleted) (and other WG participants): any objection to me creating a container comparison matrix page here on the wiki? The intent would be to capture the set of container technologies, the set of requirements, and then (as a "fill in the blanks" exercise) how each candidate technology stacks up per requirement.
No problem from me - it would be great if we can get that filled out! Thanks
Here's the (very early draft) comparison matrix. Please don't be shy about extending it!
I was referring to this page - https://openfin.co/compare/. As I mention on the call, this is biased towards Openfin capabilty. We can pick and choose what is really important.
I am listing few features that I feel are essential for our use case:
System access
Notifications
Dev tools
Security
Window persistence
White label capability
Inter app bus