2018-05-31 Meeting notes.
Meeting minutes status: Approved
Date
May 31, 2018
Attendees
Name | Organisation |
|---|---|
Nicholas Kolba | Openfin |
Brian Schwinn | Openfin |
Espen Overbye | Openfin |
Philip Broadbent | Openfin |
Jonathan Teper | JP Morgan |
Katherine Jones | Refinitiv |
Slava Kryukov | Deutsche Bank |
Goals
Discussion items
Nicholas Kolba / Philip Broadbent
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
1min | Select Scribe for meeting | group | we need someone to minute the meeting |
10min | Review PRs and Git Issues | group |
|
30min | Demo and Review of Ref Implementation by OpenFin | Demo from OpenFin - pending contribution |
|
10min | AOB | group |
|
Action items
Svyatoslav Kryukov to post issues/PR to github
Colin Eberhardt (He/Him) Nicholas Kolba & Philip Broadbent to refine APIs for Intent and handler creation
# Agenda:
Nick presented the agenda
- PR on TypeScript
- Demo from OpenFin on ref implementation
- AOB
# Rollcall
Nick,
Brian,
Espen,
JT (JMPC)
Katherine,
Philip,
Slava
# PR on TypeScript
Nick showed the TypeScript PR. Phil will review shortly. Plan to resolve early next week.
Slava looked through the PR, and has a few comments
- generally good idea using TypeScript
- recommends merging
- will propose some changes with the aim of bringing it closer to topics discussed in previous sessions
- wants more people to add feedback and contribute to this PR
- more input is needed around the spec - they have potential enhancements they want to propose, e.g. enhanced version of ‘open’
Slava, Nick, Colin discussed how to collaborate. The conclusion was that this can be done either through PRs or issues.
# OpenFin demo
Nick talked about the OpenFin reference implementation. They hope to open source in a few weeks, as part of the Hadouken program.
Phil provided a demo showing various scenarios. Colin raised a question about whether intents can be fired more than once, and whether it should be a class? Phil and Nick agreed that perhaps it didn’t make sense as a class.
Nick asked Phil about other ergonomic issues, he wasn’t so keen on the object / constructor pattern. There were other small problems that will likely be resolved via this prototype.