2018-10-25 Meeting Notes

Group agreed that there were some typescript conventions that were not being followed, but should be.

Is action a concept? Or is it just an intent and an app? "Apps feel redundant in this API"

Riko contextualized that they (JPM) have an array of actions.

Nick: Part of the problem – it's not just intents; it's list of applications sorted by intents - different sort of data structure. I agree with Riko - an action is a synthesis of an intent and an app.

Riko: I agree this doesn't feel fluid enough yet.

Call-in User 4: I think it just

Riko: Just saying falsey isn't enough - you have to show 

Leslie: One of the groups I have with the API is it doesn't use the types of the intents, etc. There should be more of an effort to synch up with what the other WGs are doing. 

Riko: I agree that the intent metadata should map what is coming out of the intents WG, and the AppD WG respectively?

WHAT WAS CONCLUSION? → drop and colin make a new 

Nick: Is there a way to find an intent that has an intent?

Has a conflict, so not ready to merge ... Nick is going to merge it today. 

MD files should not be part of repo - "a real pain"

• PR for string object to string type
  • Riko to create an issue 
  • Riko to also create an issue to remove docs from the source code. 
    
    
• Message Protocol - considering how we standardize the underlying messages on a bus
• Context Sharing / Broadcast