| Topic | Notes |
|---|
- Introductions for new joiners
| - Working rhythm - most work done in wiki docs, meetings are for escalations and synch-ups.
- Great offline work done to date - well done everyone!
|
| - Do we process use cases in Tranches? Or per use case?
- GROUP DECISION: do it per use case
- Early on we don't want to kick start one use case without setting up some initial consistency between them, so do a 'first batch' just in the beginning before progressing one on its own.
|
- Ratification - what does that mean?
| - Use Cases Scope - let's clarify:
- Focus on Desktop (FDC3)
- Mention/Capture non-Desktop and flag explicitly - decide specifics as we go through each actual example
- GROUP DECISION: OK for not every workflow to have a standard
- STATES of Use Cases (this is not for the specific individual workflows inside each of the Use Case but the use case as a whole):
- Backlog/Draft
- In Review
- Approved/Accepted (as a well defined and relevant use case only - not 'approved' as a FDC3 standard)
- Rejected (with reason)
- Process & Tooling
- GROUP DECISION: Not in Jira yet, try to use confluence as much as possible
- See actions below to get this started
- Voting
- Do it via standard FINOS way and via email - not require meeting - see action below for Nick to check with FINOS and let this group know.
- Working group members must be diligent in assessment of use cases
- Not everyone will be a stakeholder in all use cases (not expected) but use cases must have enough detail to allow review and assessment
|
| - Use Case 7 - Platform agnostic interop API - by Leslie Spiro
- CTO use cases
- GROUP QUESTION: Are non-financial-professional use cases in scope? Are CTO/CIO/CCO valid "users"? No consensus yet (ran out of time), so please discuss offline and let's decide by or at next meeting.
- Others to be discussed at next meeting (start with this). All to provide comments on the docs in the meantime.
|
| - Discussion barely started due to time, but ideas to include in template:
- flag for whether there is a standard defined to meet this specific workflow
- must be factual and detailed
|
Inter working group communication
| - Not really discussed. Saori will try to start group discussion in Google groups.
|
| - Not really discussed. Saori will try to start group discussion in Google groups.
|