Date/Time

17 Oct 2019

Attendees

Name	Organisation	Github ID (optional)
Jonathan Teper	JP Morgan
Johan Sandersson	FactSet
Tom Schady
Aitana Myohl	FINOS

Outstanding Action Items

Description	Assignee	Task appears on
Cesar Morgadinho to validate UC #15 against FDC3 1.0 standards, in the tracker	Cesar Morgadinho	2019-06-27 uc-wg meeting notes
Rhyddian Olds to validate UCs #4 & 5 against FDC3 1.0 standards, in the tracker	Rhyddian Olds	2019-06-27 uc-wg meeting notes
Leslie Spiro to validate UC #3 against FDC3 1.0 standards, in the tracker	Leslie Spiro	2019-06-27 uc-wg meeting notes
Evgeny Kovalyov to validate UCs #1 & 13 against FDC3 1.0 standards, in the tracker	Evgeny Kovalyov	2019-06-27 uc-wg meeting notes

Agenda

Time	Item	Who	Notes from the Meeting
5 min	Convene & roll call	Jonathan Teper
2 min	Review action items from previous meetings (see above)		Approved 2019-09-19 uc-wg meeting notes Action items not reviewed
10 min	OKR Review & Next Steps + Objectives & Strategy + Retrospective	Jonathan Teper	OKR Review FDC3 UC Working Group Objectives - 2019 Objectives & Strategy Proposal: Primary focus on getting a few use cases to adoption by (1) the standards groups, and the (2) the businesses Rationale: (1) several unattended use cases, (2) a few strong success stories > many partial success stories, (3) our OKRs may not be attainable UCWG feedback: Decision: Approved! Review: process for submitting use cases to other working groups - what is the preferred method? Can we document it? Raise an issue in the respective GitHub project and link to the use case To be considered: reverse flow - other working groups submitting use cases in our repo Retrospective Are we being as effective as we possibly could? Probably not. Why? There may be unwritten use cases driving the roadmap of other working groups There may adoption that hasn't been shared (ex: teams focused on delivering, not evangelising) The way the UCWG is working is not optimized for delivery There may be an inevitable delay between standards definition, adoption, and reporting of success What can be done? Solicit use cases from other working groups; perhaps other WG could raise GitHub issues in the UC working group. Focus on a few success stories and examples of "what you can do with FDC3" - see above Sleep on it
10 min	New Use Cases	Johan Sandersson Leslie Spiro	Use Case 17: Fine-tuning InterOp with Channels Target date for a vote? As soon as we move to voting on GitHub See feedback from previous meeting What is the best way to gather meaningful feedback? // not discussed "I want my application to be FDC3 compatible" - Leslie Spiro // not discussed
5 min	PMC Update	Jonathan Teper	See: 2019-10-04 Meeting
10 min	Review and sign off new persona definition	Jonathan Teper	Current persona definition: FDC3 Persona/Participant Definition Updated persona definition: Key points are: Separate FDC3 “Participant” from FDC3 “Persona” Make sure we align with the terminology on our FDC3 compliance website: https://fdc3.finos.org/docs/1.0/fdc3-compliance (“Application Provider” and “Platform Provider”) Suggest that we actually change the compliance document above and ask them to use “Implementors” instead of “Personas”. The website should not be using the word “Persona” here, as readers could get confused with the UC Personas. We can ask for the change in github or to Riko (via PMC). See: FDC3 Persona Participant Definition.docx and Decisions: Approved! Q: Should this be in GitHub rather than Confluence? YES
5 min	Proposal: documenting adoption in GitHub	Jonathan Teper	See: use cases adoption summary here and here (proposed) // not discussed
10 min	Open discussion: how we work	Jonathan Teper	Online vs offline GitHub Kanban Tom Schady set up the GitHub board for the voice program Proposal to pilot a GitHub Kanban board for UCWG Improving efficiency and reach?
5 min	AOB & adjourn		Proposal to move voting on use cases to GitHub Tom Schady to submit proposal to vote on use cases in GitHub to the WG Proposal to pilot a GitHub Kanban Board for the Use Cases Working Group. Decision: unanimously approved by the WG participants! See: https://github.com/FDC3/FDC3/projects/1?add_cards_query=is%3Aopen Aitana Myohl to confirm with Rob

Decisions Made

Action Items

Capture any actions that were identified here, and make sure they are also captured on the group's task page during, or immediately after, the meeting