Skip to end of metadata
-
Created by Former user (Deleted), last modified on Jul 30, 2018
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 9
Next »
Date
Participants
Minutes:
| Topic | Notes |
|---|
| Voting in FINOS | - FINOS prefers consensus in voting. Unanimous is best
- Happy for working groups to establish their own voting method
|
| Review of Use Cases | - Tom Schady went through his use cases
- We need agreement needed on how much detail is needed, and whether we should include examples of 'typical' use cases
- Should not be prescriptive or imply implementations
- Voting based on a quorum of Yes and No votes eg 80% Yes, 20% No
- Similar use cases should be linked
|
| Review of process | - All please review and comment here: Process Proposal
- Each 'accepted' use cases should receive a paragraph from the working group on how it will be implemnted
- Rejected use cases need explanation of why they have been rejected
|
| Review of use case format | - We should continue to refine as more use cases are submitted
- Leslie Spiro to propose Acceptance Criteria for use cases.
|
| Technical use cases | - Still contention on whether we should support technical use cases or not:
- These use cases cover a need for FDC3 and so should be considered
- Technical use cases should be discussed within the working groups not the use case working groups
- We do not have enough business use cases for the time being and should focus on that rather than technical use cases.
- Agreement to review next time and if no consensus then we would have a vote on whether to accept these use cases
|
Action items
Proposed Agenda: