Ben Gold from Wellington introduced himself. 

Rob Underwood mentioned that PMC program updates are due Tuesday

Standards Ratification Process

• Saori
  • It's very important that everyone reads these carefully
  • Saori: What is this?
  • We realized we need a process to govern how we approve standards, including how we approve items like use cases
  • We realized that some of the steps required for other forms of technical standards were not needed to do approval of use cases
  • What we do need to do for use cases that we approve we need to present to the general meeting 
• Kat: I had a question → how do we want to manage this? Once it is approved, for each of the use cases, we will change the document status to "approved" going forward?
• Johan: How is that changed?
• Saori: I would suggest that the person that originally 
• Rob: When you change status please use the "What did you change?" field to reflect the vote itself related to the status change.

Next steps in use cases process

• Confirm ownership
• Presentation to PMC and other WGs

group

Voting Approvals

Use Case 1

• Google Groups vote: All voted yes but Jonathan Teper, who voted to do "in review"

• I think we have acceptance. Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 1 was accepted.

Use Case 2

• Google Group: 5 people voted; everyone voted to accept

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 2 was accepted.

Use Case 3

• Google Group: 5 people voted; everyone voted to accept

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 3 was accepted.

Use Case 4

• 4 votes

  • 3 votes to approve

  • 1 in review – uncertainty for the workflow comment from Johan. "It's the end application that is doing the work; I'm not sure where the interop functionality comes in"

    • Leslie: This use case in talking about where/how to inject own credit checking system

  • Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 4 was accepted.

Use Case 5

• Google Group: 5 people voted; everyone voted to accept

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 5 was accepted.

Use Case 6

• Leslie: Needs to also consider situation where the app is already running
• Aaron: You might also set a date and action item for a 2nd vote to make it more likely to clearly reject/pass; or also create an expiration process
• Saori moved to keep in review

Use Case 7

• Google Group: 2 votes to reject, 1 to approve

• Kat made motion by acclamation to reject t this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 7 was rejected.

Use Case 8

• Google Group: 

• Kat made motion by acclamation to keep in review Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 8 was kept in review

Use Case 9

• Google Group: 5 people voted; everyone voted to accept

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 9 was accepted.

Use Case 10

• Google Group: 5 people voted; everyone voted to accept

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 10 was accepted

Use Case 13

• Google Group: 

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 13 was accepted

Use Case 14

• Google Group: 

• at made motion by acclamation to keep in review Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 14 was kept in review

Use Case 15

• Google Group: 5 people voted; everyone voted to accept

• Kat made motion by acclamation to accept this use case. Hearing no objections the motion passed and use case 15 was accepted

Next Steps

• These need to presented at the next general meeting

Use "announce@" to share use cases beyond FDC3?

Tom then walked through the specific sections of the use case. See following screen shot:

Tom mentioned that Maurizio Pillitu has enabled a polling function to do voting on the use cases. 

Tom showed how a use cases table could be created, and could be used to process a larger list of use case items

• "The table is a simple key value store"

Tom walked through the poll modal:

Leslie: Can you add a reason for rejecting?

• Tom: can't do that directly yet

Tom: the power comes from the page properties report – anything you'd like to search and sort on

Saori: Everyone needs to add the page properties macro.

Johan: Do we need to add an owner? or can we assume it's the author? What is the person drop off?

No other business to note. 

Leslie: Use Cases will be presented, and the other WGs will be told they need to respond.

• Kat offered to draft something for the next stage in the process; next general meeting October 2