Meeting minutes status: Draft (pending approval)
Date
Attendees
| Name | Organisation |
|---|---|
| Nicholas Kolba | Openfin |
| Rob Underwood | FINOS |
| Adam Lancaster | Tick42 |
| Espen Overbye | Openfin |
| Katherine Jones | Refinitiv |
| Leslie Spiro | Tick42 |
| Riko Eksteen | JP Morgan |
| Zoltan Bourne | Citadel |
Goals
Discussion items
group
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 min | roll call - get started | group | we need someone to minute the meeting |
| 5 min | Review PR 42 | group | The group reviewed PR 42 to fix documentation |
| 15 | Review PR 43 | group | Group discussed PR 43
Group agreed that there were some typescript conventions that were not being followed, but should be. Is action a concept? Or is it just an intent and an app? "Apps feel redundant in this API" Riko contextualized that they (JPM) have an array of actions. Nick: Part of the problem – it's not just intents; it's list of applications sorted by intents - different sort of data structure. I agree with Riko - an action is a synthesis of an intent and an app.
Riko: I agree this doesn't feel fluid enough yet. Call-in User 4: I think it just
Riko: Just saying falsey isn't enough - you have to show Leslie: One of the groups I have with the API is it doesn't use the types of the intents, etc. There should be more of an effort to synch up with what the other WGs are doing. Riko: I agree that the intent metadata should map what is coming out of the intents WG, and the AppD WG respectively? WHAT WAS CONCLUSION? → drop and colin make a new |
| 5 |
Nick: Is there a way to find an intent that has an intent? | ||
| PR 40 | Has a conflict, so not ready to merge ... Nick is going to merge it today. MD files should not be part of repo - "a real pain" | ||
| 25 min | new topics | group |
|
| 10min | AOB | group |
Action items
Identified During Meeting
From previous meeting
Task report
Looking good, no incomplete tasks.