Sprint Plan to Public Launch
Sprint 1: 12/17 - 12/31
- Organizations continue trial implementation and evaluation of standards
- Documentation (see Documentation Sub-Plan) - Espen Overbye Maurizio Pillitu
- Decide micro-site (fdc3.finos.org) information architecture
- Assign authors and editors to section of the site
Sprint 2: 1/2 - 1/15
- Milestone (1/15): Conclude evaluation period
Sprint 3: 1/16 - 1/31
- Identify fixes and changes needed based on feedback generated during evaluation period
Sprint 4: 2/1 - 2/15
Sprint 5: 2/16 - 2/18
- Implement support model
- Finalize and publish documentation
Launch Day: 3/1
- Put press release on the wire (Caliber, FINOS PR Firm)
Post Go-Live (3/1/2018 ~ )
Go-Live Check-List
The following go-live check-list to help the PMC and respective working group and project leads track progress, including and especially the requirements for activation that must be met to move a release formally to released status.
Requirement for Activation | Criteria for Release | Explanation | Owner | Status | Comments |
---|
Licensing |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Team | "The project is supported by an engaged project team. While there may not be a formal SLA (depending on the availability of commercial support for the project), bugs and enhancement requests will be triaged and addressed by the team." | From Activation page, "The project should have active contribution from two or more committers." |
|
|
|
Documentation - README.md | "The project is well documented." | README.md requirements met in Github repo |
|
| See Documentation Sub-Plan for more detail |
| "The project is well documented." | Required and recommended sections of the product (FDC3) microsite |
|
| See Documentation Sub-Plan for more detail |
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
Binaries | The installation & upgrade experiences should be relatively smooth - binaries will be available at a minimum, and more advanced deployment options (installers, containers, VM images, automated upgrade scripts etc.) may also be available. |
|
|
|
|
Adoption |
| From Activation page, "Proof of adoption (e.g. in the form of download statistics, citing known deployments, etc.) must be provided." For FDC3, this means there should be a mechanism put in place to track usage and adoption of the standard |
|
|
|
| "The software is functional, though perhaps minimally viable."
| Some form of user acceptance testing has been performed. |
|
|
|
| "The software has high quality - it has met or exceeded all of the Foundation's security and compliance requirements, and has been well tested."
| Unit, integration, performance, and other forms of testing have been performed an acceptable level of quality achieved. |
|
|
|
| "The installation & upgrade experiences should be relatively smooth - binaries will be available at a minimum, and more advanced deployment options (installers, containers, VM images, automated upgrade scripts etc.) may also be available." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "The project is supported by an engaged project team. While there may not be a formal SLA (depending on the availability of commercial support for the project), bugs and enhancement requests will be triaged and addressed by the team. |
|
|
|
|
| "Backwards compatibility is a priority, and semantic versioning is used to clearly communicate breaking changes." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Tasks, Milestones, and Due Dates
Milestone | Example Component Tasks | Owner | Deadline | Status | Dependency Notes | Notes |
---|
Trademark transferred from OpenFin to FINOS |
| OpenFin (Nicholas Kolba) and FINOS (Aaron Williamson) |
| |
|
|
Revised FINOS Branding of FDC3 Delivered | - Engage Designer
- Present current FDC3 design
- Iterate over options
- Select option
- Receive final high res and web res assets
| FINOS (Tosha Ellison) |
| Status |
---|
colour | Yellow |
---|
title | In Progress |
---|
|
|
Product release roadmap
...
Distribution Channels & Launch Activities
...