Page Comparison

Date

26 Jul 2018

Topic	Notes
Voting in FINOS	FINOS prefers consensus in voting. Unanimous is best Happy for working groups to establish their own voting method
Review of Use Cases	Tom Schady went through his use cases We need agreement needed on how much detail is needed, and whether we should include examples of 'typical' use cases Should not be prescriptive or imply implementations Voting based on a quorum of Yes and No votes eg 80% Yes, 20% No Similar use cases should be linked
Review of process	All please review and comment here: Process Proposal Each 'accepted' use cases should receive a paragraph from the working group on how it will be implemnted Rejected use cases need explanation of why they have been rejected
Review of use case format	We should continue to refine as more use cases are submitted Leslie Spiro to propose Acceptance Criteria for use cases.
Technical use cases	Still contention on whether we should support technical use cases or not: These use cases cover a need for FDC3 and so should be considered Technical use cases should be discussed within the working groups not the use case working groups We do not have enough business use cases for the time being and should focus on that rather than technical use cases. Agreement to review next time and if no consensus then we would have a vote on whether to accept these use cases

Review action items from previous meeting
Rhyddian Olds and Tom Schady present use case
Process Proposal: Review and agree on process, tools etc.
Use Case guidelines and format proposal: Review and agree on template to be used for use cases
Voting
- How should this be managed?
- Nicholas Kolba to present any updates
Are "CTO" use cases in scope? See discussion started here: Are technical Use Cases valid for this Working Group.

...