Working rhythm - most work done in wiki docs, meetings are for escalations and synch-ups.
Great offline work done to date - well done everyone!
Timeframes
Do we process use cases in Tranches? Or per use case?
GROUP DECISION: do it per use case
Early on we don't want to kick start one use case without setting up some initial consistency between them, so do a 'first batch' just in the beginning before progressing one on its own.
Ratification - what does that mean?
Use Cases Scope - let's clarify:
Focus on Desktop (FDC3)
Mention/Capture non-Desktop and flag explicitly - decide specifics as we go through each actual example
GROUP DECISION: OK for not every workflow to have a standard
STATES of Use Cases (this is not for the specific individual workflows inside each of the Use Case but the use case as a whole):
Backlog/Draft
In Review
Approved/Accepted (as a well defined and relevant use case only - not 'approved' as a FDC3 standard)
Rejected (with reason)
Process & Tooling
GROUP DECISION: Not in Jira yet, try to use confluence as much as possible
See actions below to get this started
Voting
Do it via standard FINOS way and via email - not require meeting - see action below for Nick to check with FINOS and let this group know.
Working group members must be diligent in assessment of use cases
Not everyone will be a stakeholder in all use cases (not expected) but use cases must have enough detail to allow review and assessment
GROUP QUESTION: Are non-financial-professional use cases in scope? Are CTO/CIO/CCO valid "users"? No consensus yet (ran out of time), so please discuss offline and let's decide by or at next meeting.
Others to be discussed at next meeting (start with this). All to provide comments on the docs in the meantime.
Templates for Use Cases
Discussion barely started due to time, but ideas to include in template:
flag for whether there is a standard defined to meet this specific workflow
must be factual and detailed
Inter working group communication
Not really discussed. Saori will try to start group discussion in Google groups.
Wider FINOS interlock
Not really discussed. Saori will try to start group discussion in Google groups.
Open Questions (for next session)
Presentation of use cases (Rhyddian and Tom)
Voting - how should we do this?
How do we gauge interest to move a use case from backlog/draft into review mode?
Template items - what to include?
Are "CTO Use Cases" in scope?
Action items
Nicholas Kolba to check on voting process - align with FINOS