Table of Contents
Date
Attendees
| Name | ESCo Role | Organisation | Present / Absent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Lead | Symphony LLC | ||
| Project Lead | Goldman Sachs | ||
| Project Lead | Symphony LLC | ||
| Project Lead | Markit | ||
| Project Lead | Credit Suisse | ||
| Former user (Deleted) | Advisor | Citi | |
| Nicholas Kolba | Advisor | OpenFin | |
| Secretary | Symphony Software Foundation | ||
| Gabriele Columbro | Guest | Symphony Software Foundation |
Actions items from previous meeting
- Peter Monks to communicate WG eligibility rules to WG chairs (as part of governance refinements comms)
- Peter Monks investigate alternative voting mechanisms and report back to the ESCo
- Peter Monks: to coordinate development of a proposal for working group status reporting
- All: review project reporting proposal and provide feedback
- Former user (Deleted): work with Maurizio Pillitu to finalise CI / CD of symphony-java-client against the ODP
- Michael Harmon: draft the proposal for the new "grace period" lifecycle state
- Peter Monks: schedule an email vote to approve the new state
Agenda
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 min | Roll call | ||
| 5 min | Review action items from last meeting |
| |
| 15 min | Advisor welcome and introductions | Former user (Deleted), Nicholas Kolba have recently been elected as ESCo Advisors. | |
| 15 min | BoD status reporting refinements | All | Following the January BoD meeting, what worked well and what didn't? Going forward, what and how would ESCo like to capture individual project / WG status, conslidate it, and report it up to the board? Note: this is related to the existing action item around project reporting proposal. |
| 5 min | AOB |