Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 32 Current »

Date

Attendees

Present:

Avatar
Member
Organization
Role
ESCo role
John StecherGoldman SachsManaging DirectorBoard Lead
Lawrence MillerSymphony LLCEVP, Global TechnologySymphony Lead
Gabriele Columbro [Administrator]Symphony Software FoundationExecutive DirectorSecretary / Non Voting

Absent:

Avatar
Member
Organization
Role
ESCo role
Mike HarmonSymphony LLCCTOSymphony Lead

Agenda / Minutes

TimeItemObjectivesCommentsDecisions / Resolutions
10minReview action items from previous meeting

Zero inbox (smile)

All tasks from previous meeting, except 1 deferred to next meeting.Defer to the next meeting:
  • GC / MH: start working on a plan for Symphony readiness to open source and contribute 
10minESCo voting process
  • Quorum?
  • Majority?
  • Time / deadline for email votes?
  • Silent consensus?
  • Simple majority always applies?
  • Tie-breaker?

  • The Quorum to deliberate is 2/3 of the ESCo Project Leads.
  • The Majority required to deliberate is absolute majority (50% + 1)
  • The default deadline for email votes is 72h, unless otherwise specified.
  • Can votes be approved by silent consensus? No
  • Does the ESCo adopt resolutions by super-majority? No
  • There is no need for a tie-breaker. In case of tie the motion is not passed as the majority needs to be absolute (50% + 1).
10minESCo members rotation
  • Ratify 2y membership? Yes
  • Ratify staggering? Yes
  • So call a members meeting (special or regular in May) to elect the 2 new Member leads? Yes
  • And then all together elect ESC Community Members?

LM: Implement proper staggering, keeping in consideration community and working group actual involvement.
  • Project Leads will serve for a term of 2 year in the ESCo
  • ESCo will implement staggering for the ESCo member rotation, to ensure max 50% of the ESCo composition is changed at one time 
  • The two remaining Project Leads (Member Leads) This will naturally happen with the election of new Member Leads in May in the annual Member meeting.
  • Once the Project Leads are filled, all together they will elect the ESC Community Leads
5minSelection of symphonyoss.org naming

Gab presented that the Foundation acquired:


LM: We need to clarify, too many domains (e.g. symphony.foundation, symphonyOSF) Naming approved.
15minContribution process

Gab to present Projects and legal documents.


  • Deferred to next meeting
  • ESCo members to review and contribute to Projects
10minDiscuss Acceptance criteriaDocs, code standards, license headers, code formatting, etc.
  • Deferred to next meeting
  • ESCo members to work on acceptance criteria and contribute to Projects (section about acceptance criteria)

The meeting was adjourned to Friday Feb 5th at 12PM EST.

Action items from previous meeting

This is a record of items to be completed by this meeting:

  • Gabriele Columbro: Create conference rooms for symphony-dev / symphony-users (access should be moderated) - approved
  • Gabriele Columbro:  Reach out to members for working groups candidature (10 days deadline + clear responsibilities)
  • Gabriele Columbro: Check in bylaws who nominate working groups member <-- ESCo
  • ESCO members: define criteria of acceptance for Symphony contribution <-- Initial DRAFT available
  • ESCo members: Check whether archive is visible with corporate email address

Deferred discussions (ESCo backlog)

The following discussions have been deferred to the next meeting(s) - in decreasing priority order:

  • Contribution process
  • Discuss Acceptance criteria
  • Discuss software projects governance (as opposed to working group) / potential bylaws changes (e.g. PMC)
  • Does the ESCo approve the presence of a Foundation officer as ESCo member? (needs to be ratified at BOD level)
  • Review and approve Working Groups governance (Working Groups)

Action items for next meeting

  • JohnS --> Send reminder for working groups, keep same deadline (Lawrence can follow up)
  • Gabriele Columbro / Mike Harmon: start working on a plan for Symphony readiness to open source and contribute 
  • Discuss potential bylaws changes (Per project committers and PMC, Representation in the ESCo / Board –> Community Members?)
  • Gabriele Columbro: give password reset ESCo members of their @symphony.foundation address
  • Gabriele Columbro: policies of electing ESCo members in staggered way
  • JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups
  • ESCo: Review Projects
  • JS/Gabriele Columbro: collaborate on acceptance criteria in Projects (or create new page)
  • ESCo: Review Working Groups governance page



  • No labels