Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date


Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1minSelect Scribe for meetinggroupwe need someone to minute the meeting
10 minOther FINOS Governance itemsgroup

Nicholas Kolba met with Aaron Williamson and Rob Underwood (Deactivated) re: governance.  Here were the minutes from that meeting: 

  • Minutes Embargo
    • 2 days
    • Only available to WG members (Confluence group) then made public
      • Automatic process if possible, otherwise admin access for committee/PMC leads
    • ACTION: Aaron to raise INT for INFRA
  • Standards Ratification
    • Process not spelled out in POP
    • Generic voting rules sufficient, plus ratification by PMC?
      • If not, amend the POP to set out explicit voting rules for standards
      • ACTION: Aaron to attend next FDC3 PMC meeting
    • Role of PMC & other WGs in approval of WG-ratified standards
      • Proposal:
        • Notice-and-comment period
        • WG decides whether to revise
        • N&C for any revisions
        • Ratification by WG and PMC
      • ACTION:
        • Aaron to review PGP & POP re: revising POP
        • Aaron to draft revision to POP
    • Parking lot: communications re: why we're different from a standards development organization
  • FDC3 Badging
    • Aaron: Ought to be a certification mark for FDC3 compliance
      • Prevent bad-faith/inconsistent use
      • Foundation needs to own the trademark to register & enforce
      • Should comply with PTO requirements for certification marks to be registered & enforceable
20 minGovernancegroup

decide on process for ratifying standards.  

Proposed outline:

  • Proposed standard raised by WG
    • by consensus
    • by majority vote if consensus can't be reached (good faith effort)
  • Proposal Published on Confluence or Github (depending on WG)
  • Proposed standard presented at next general meeting
  • Mailing Group set up for Proposal comments
  • 2 weeks comment period from community
  • PMC ratification
    • by consensus
    • by majority vote if consensus can't be reached (good faith effort)
  • Ratified standards should be versioned and published on confluence

For Use Cases, the process is simpler:

  • Proposed standard raised by WG
    • by consensus
    • by majority vote if consensus can't be reached (good faith effort)
  • Ratified use cases should be clearly marked and published on confluence
20minAOBgroup

Action items

  • No labels