DRAFT - PENDING APPROVAL AT NEXT WG MEETING on 11/1
Table of Contents
Date/Time
Attendees
Name | Organisation | Role |
---|---|---|
Refinitiv | ||
Former user (Deleted) | Refinitiv | Chair |
Adam Lancaster | Tick42 | |
Ben Gold | Wellington | |
David Jones | ipushpull | |
Espen Overbye | OpenFin | |
Johan Sandersson | FactSet | |
Leslie Spiro | Tick42 | |
Sean McQuay | Saggezza | |
Tom Schady | GreenKey | |
Rob Underwood (Deactivated) | FINOS | |
Tosha Ellison | FINOS | Recording Secretary |
Action Items
Tasks Identified and Assigned
- All Use Case Owners: Update use cases with dependent FDC3 WGs
Task Report from Last Meeting
(In the task report select the meetings notes from the LAST meeting in the 'Space(s) and page(s)' field to auto-populate this table– remove this note before publishing)
Task report
Looking good, no incomplete tasks.
Decisions Made
- The group assigned individuals from the FDC3 Use Cases WG to present the accepted use cases to the other FDC3 as well as FO working groups.
- <Decision>
Agenda and Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 min | Select Scribe for meeting | group | Tosha Ellison volunteered to be scribe. |
1 min | Roll call | group | Attendees introduced themselves including individuals new to the WG discussion:
|
1 min | Review Minutes | group | Kat made a motion to approve minutes for the last two meetings (Sep 6 and Sep 20). Saori seconded the motion. There being no objections minutes were approved. |
3 min | Housekeeping - Next mtg location | group | There is an option to hold the next WG meeting in person in NY. Refinitiv can host for anyone who can make it. The date might also be adjusted to accommodate schedules (and a conference). Saori will send an email to the group on this topic. |
5 | FDC3 Background | group | Kat provided a brief background and introduction on the FDC3 Use Case WG including an overview of the wiki:
|
30 min | Discussion of what's next for the accepted use case | group | A main purpose of the meeting was to determine the best way to present the use cases to other relevant working groups and agree next steps to action this. The following points were agreed:
The group, including new participants, was encouraged to submit use cases and also to read existing use cases first to avoid submissions being rejected for being duplicates. It was also pointed out that those use cases "under review" are still "live" and can be revisited following modifications. Where use cases have been accepted all comments have been considered and incorporated (or not) as appropriate. Kat and Saori to consider how to make it clearer that these are final. |
3 min | Reviewing open action items | group | |
5 min | AOB | group | No other business to note. |