Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Date
Attendees
Agenda
| Topic | Notes |
|---|
| Voting in FINOS | - FINOS prefers consensus in voting. Unanimous is best
- Happy for working groups to establish their own voting method
|
| Review of Use Cases | - Tom Schady went through his use cases
- We need agreement needed on how much detail is needed, and whether we should include examples of 'typical' use cases
- Should not be prescriptive or imply implementations
- Voting based on a quorum of Yes and No votes eg 80% Yes, 20% No
- Similar use cases should be linked
|
| Review of process | - All please review and comment here: Process Proposal
- Each 'accepted' use cases should receive a paragraph from the working group on how it will be implemnted
- Rejected use cases need explanation of why they have been rejected
|
| Review of use case format | - We should continue to refine as more use cases are submitted
- Leslie Spiro to propose Acceptance Criteria for use cases.
|
| Technical use cases | - Still contention on whether we should support technical use cases or not:
- These use cases cover a need for FDC3 and so should be considered
- Technical use cases should be discussed within the working groups not the use case working groups
- We do not have enough business use cases for the time being and should focus on that rather than technical use cases.
- Agreement to review next time and if no consensus then we would have a vote on whether to accept these use cases
|
Action items
Proposed Agenda: