Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Table of Contents

Date/Time

 


Attendees


Action Items

  • Add agenda item for future meeting to discuss metrics.
  • Jonathan Teper to provide reading material on OKRs to help inform metrics discussion.
  • Rob Underwood (Deactivated) to confirm repo archiving process/timing.


Task Report from Last Meeting



Agenda and Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minsConvene and roll callgroup

Confirmed roll call.

Meeting minutes from previous meeting approved.

3 minReviewing open action itemsgroupAll action items complete (except migrating Use Case 15).
5 min

Use cases on GitHub: 

  • Assign ownership for UC 15 
group

Group reviewed the use cases in the single repository. Discussion included:

  • Discussed Issue 33
  • Agreed to keep the number of the use case (e.g. 005) on the title but remove the date. Added use Case 15.
  • The "Use Cases" text on the bottom of fdc3.finos.org should be a link to the use cases.
  • Agreed to keep an "Interoperability Points" section at the bottom of each use case that highlights interoperability with other areas of FDC3.
  • Rob will confirm with Mao the process for archiving the old repo once migration is complete.
20 minReview & Confirm Use Cases roadmapGroup

The Use Cases roadmap is documented as part of the overall FDC3 roadmap here. Discussion included:

  • Current roadmap states "Continue to process new and existing FDC3 Use Cases"
  • Reminder that the group had previously agreed that before taking on new use cases it was important to clarify for existing use cases the interaction with / dependencies on the standards.
  • Some use cases need multibus/multi-container - not clear when this will be on the roadmap
  • Agreed to add to the roadmap discussion around elevating the Use Case WG to be cross-program (or potentially creating a new one)
  • Group discussed setting metrics such as, time to publish (from first discussed to ratified and published); use cases published to adopted %. Agreed that it's important to set metrics and the group should take some time to think about them and add this to the agenda for a future meeting. JT offered to send reading material on OKRs.
  • Rob provided a link to info metrics that each WG is expected to track as part of the Program Health Checks.
5 minAOBgroup

None

  • No labels