Date
Attendees
Present:
Present:
Avatar | Member | Organization | Role | ESCo role |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | John Stecher | Goldman Sachs | Managing Director | Board Lead |
 | Lawrence Miller | Symphony LLC | EVP, Global Technology | Symphony Lead |
| Gabriele Columbro [Administrator] | Symphony Software Foundation | Executive Director | Secretary / Non Voting | |
 | Mike Harmon | Symphony LLC | CTO | Symphony Lead |
Agenda / Minutes
| Time | Item | Objectives | Comments | Decisions / Resolutions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20min | Code Contribution process | Gab to present Code Contribution Process (DRAFT) and legal documents. | The meeting line was disturbed. Vote was sent via email. | Contribution process approved on 02/08 with Email Vote. |
| 10min | Code contribution acceptance criteria | Review and enhance Code Contribution Process (DRAFT) (section about acceptance criteria). | Deferred to next meeting. | |
| 20min | Ratify working groups composition | Review Working Group - Financial Objects Standardization and Working Group - Desktop Wrapper API and approve composition. | The meeting line was disturbed. Votes was sent via email. | Working Groups ratified on 02/08 with Email Vote. |
| 10min | New working group creation process | Review Working Groups governance page and approve the draft process. | Deferred to next meeting. |
The meeting was adjourned to TBC.
This is a record of items to be completed by this meeting:
- JohnS --> Send reminder for working groups, keep same deadline (Lawrence can follow up)
- Gabriele Columbro / Mike Harmon: start working on a plan for Symphony readiness to open source and contribute
- Gabriele Columbro: give password reset ESCo members of their @symphony.foundation address
- Gabriele Columbro: policies of electing ESCo members in staggered way
- JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups
- Gabriele Columbro: check the same with other BOD members
- ESCo: Review Code Contribution Process (DRAFT)
- JS/Gabriele Columbro: collaborate on acceptance criteria in Code Contribution Process (DRAFT) (or create new page)
- ESCo: Review Working Groups governance page
Deferred discussions (ESCo backlog)
The following discussions have been deferred to the next meeting(s) - in decreasing priority order:
- Contribution process
- Discuss Acceptance criteria
- Discuss independent software projects governance (as opposed to working group) (e.g. Project Committers + PMC)
- Does the ESCo approve the presence of a Foundation officer as ESCo member? (needs to be ratified at BOD level)
- Review and approve Working Groups governance (Working Groups)
Action items for next meeting
- JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups
- Gabriele Columbro: check the same with other BOD members