Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Table of Contents

Date/Time

 


Attendees

NameOrganisationRole




Action Items

Tasks Identified and Assigned

  • All Use Case Owners: Update use cases with dependent FDC3 WGs

Task Report from Last Meeting

(In the task report select the meetings notes from the LAST meeting in the 'Space(s) and page(s)' field to auto-populate this table– remove this note before publishing)

Task report

Looking good, no incomplete tasks.


Decisions Made

  • <Decision>
  • <Decision>


Agenda and Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minSelect Scribe for meetinggroup
3 minHousekeeping Part IgroupShould we meet in person? 
1 minRoll callgroupShawn is from Sagezza evaluating how they can be part 
1 minReview MinutesgroupKat made motion to approve last two minutes
5Housekeeping IIgroup

Kat walked through the wiki and explained why the use cases WG exists (define the use cases for the other WGs to build for)

  • Kat: "Feel free to add use cases"
  • Statuses show different states of the use cases



OSSF

Productization 

30 minDiscussion of what's next for the accepted use casegroup

This was the "main purpose of the meeting"

Owner of the use case will identify the other working groups represented, and then we have a WG representation who will take the use cases to that WG, and will present them

Action item from Leslie: Can we an optional field to capture other working groups impacted?


Who will be the reps?

  • API Reps: Kat and Leslie
  • AppD: Leslie
  • Intents: Espen
  • Context: Saori


Saori: will there be any use cases that will have impact on voice?



3 minReviewing open action itemsgroup
40 minUse case discussionsgroup
10 minVote readiness (logistics, sufficient feedback, etc.)group
5 minAOBgroupNo other business to note.
  • No labels