Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date 

 

Attendees

NameOrganisation
Thomson Reuters
Adam LancasterTick 42
Tick 42
Fincad
Wellington 
Greenkey
OpenFin 


Agenda

TopicNotes
Voting in FINOS 
  • FINOS prefers consensus in voting. Unanimous is best 
  • Happy for working groups to establish their own voting method  
Review of Use Cases
  • Tom Schady went through his use cases 
  • We need agreement needed on how much detail is needed, and whether we should include examples of 'typical' use cases
    • Should not be prescriptive or imply implementations  
  • Voting based on a quorum of Yes and No votes eg 80% Yes, 20% No 
  • Similar use cases should be linked 
Review of process 
  • All please review and comment here: Process Proposal 
  • Each 'accepted' use cases should receive a paragraph from the working group on how it will be implemnted
  • Rejected use cases need explanation of why they have been rejected 
Review of use case format 
  • We should continue to refine as more use cases are submitted 
  • Leslie Spiro to propose Acceptance Criteria for use cases. 
Technical use cases
  • Still contention on whether we should support technical use cases or not:
    • These use cases cover a need for FDC3 and so should be considered 
    • Technical use cases should be discussed within the working groups not the use case working groups 
    • We do not have enough business use cases for the time being and should focus on that rather than technical use cases. 
  • Agreement to review next time and if no consensus then we would have a vote on whether to accept these use cases

...