Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

 Date

30 May

Attendees

...

Goals

  • Establish the basics

...

Thomson Reuters
JPM
Morgan Stanley

Jonathan Teper

Morgan Stanley


Agenda

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeGroup

We need some to take notes

10 minIntro/AssumptionsEspen

Establishing and agreeing upon assumptions for FDC3 Interop & intents

  • Intents will be visible to end user → human readable
  • Fire & forget will bring us a long way (manual copy/paste is fire&forget)
  • Humans will likely always be part of workflow
    • Aim for "StageOrder" not "SendOrder"
  • Receiving application resolves ambiguity
  • UX is important - multi window InterOp is much more complex than on Mobile

  • Starting simple is key
  • 10 minValidate intent approachExtending Intent with ContextEspenThe current draft proposes a VerbNoun approachPropose to align with Android intents and extend Intent with Context
    5 minNaming conventionEspen

    Display name, CamelCasing and human readable names

    • Formal definition file?
    • Language support?
    5 minValidate intent approachEspenThe current draft proposes a VerbNoun approach
    5 minAlignement with Usecase WGEspen

    The Usecase WG has defined the first example use cases

    Proposal: Use Usecase WG proposals as key validator for new intents 

    10 minList of IntentsEspenReview current list, agree/discuss proposed updated list (see attached file)
    10 minAOBGroup

    Action items

    •  


    View file
    nameFDC3 Intents WG 2017.05.30.pdf
    height250