Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

...

Attendees

Role
NameOrganisation
Refinitiv
Refinitiv
Johan SanderssonFactSet
Leslie SpiroTick42
Tom SchadyGreenKey
Ben GoldWellington
Tosha EllisonFINOS


Action Items

Tasks Identified and Assigned

  •  Tosha to check on existence of a WestPac CCLA (there is not one)
  •  JT to review PRs (reviewed during meeting)
  •  Raise topic for FDC3 PMC - Discuss whether it is necessary to have FDC3 Use Cases specific permissions (and other groups) in the new common central FDC3 repo.

...

(In the task report select the meetings notes from the LAST meeting in the 'Space(s) and page(s)' field to auto-populate this table– remove this note before publishing)

Task report
labelsfdc3_uc_working_group


Decisions Made

  • <Decision>
  • <Decision>

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minsConvene and role roll callgroup

Minutes from previous meeting (7 Feb 19) approved.

Roll call via WebEx accepted.

3 minReviewing open action itemsgroupAction items discussed and all complete.
20 min

Use cases on GitHub: 

  • Outstanding 
  • Central FDC3 GitHub 
group

Discussion items 

  • Not all use cases had been added to GitHub repo so Kat will put them in markdown, Johan will add them to the repo and Saori will review (and approve if appropriate).
  • Confirmed that FDC3 PMC agreed that WGs can set their own additional permissioning requirements.
  • Reminder that anything merged into the repo is auto-deployed onto the microsite.
  • Agreed to merge CODEOWNERS (and Tom modified so that it would work when merged to the new single repository). This adds the requirement of approval from one of the three named individuals - the WG chairs.
  • Discussed the crossover from the old to the new, single GitHub repository and confirmed approach to complete all necessary merges outstanding in current repo before migrating to new single repo.
  • The group reviewed a number of issues/PRs, which can be found here.
  • Saori reminded the group that the only use case in GitHub are the ones that have been accepted in Confluence.

  • Discussed the best way to represent links from the use cases to the specifications/standards that are relevant for implementation of the specific workflows/functions, e.g. keep in confluence, embed within the Use Cases in GitHub, provide sample code, challenges pinpointing the specific points of the specs to reference, highlighting the links in a clean, clear way, etc.
  • Agreed that the priority for the FDC3 release is to have the accepted use cases in the repo and any other documentation complete and that the linkages could be addressed after and that GitHub Issues could be the right place to have this discussion and engage the user community.
  • Reviewed a rendering issue and reminder that some front matter needs to remain as the tool that does the auto-deploy to web requires this.
5 minAOBgroupNo other business to note.

...