Versions Compared

Old Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Rob Underwood (Deactivated)

Saved on

compared with

New Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Rob Underwood (Deactivated)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

...

Decisions Made

Action Items

Capture any actions that were identified here, and make sure they are also captured on the group's task page during, or immediately after, the meeting

  •  Review and Approve the Revised POP
    •  Relabel working groups as projects
  •  Someone from the program PMC has provided input on the FAQ
  •  PMC provided direction on what their confluence entitlements and security should be ("Please prioritize getting infra@finos.org guidance on your wiki permissions per slide 22 of the pan-PMC presentation")
  •  Demonstrated evidence of publishing agenda ahead of meetings
  •  Demonstrated evidence of becoming self-sufficient in doing meeting minutes
  •  PMC has provided guidance on if/when they want/need a Github Microsite
  •  PMC has provided guidance on if/when they want to use Github (either Github Wiki or GH Pages) to replace collaboration use cases currently done on Confluence
  •  PMC has provided direction on if/when they would like to move their repos into the FINOS github ORG, and, if move is approved, move has happened. 
  •  Evidence that those in program (at member) are getting Github IDs
  •  Programs Repos have been updated with README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md that reflects CCLA language [INT-643]
  •  Program Repos have a NOTICE file with copyright statements; code docs have license headers
  •  Have provided at least one help wanted to "This Week at FINOS" or done a "Good First Issue" in a github repo
  •  Have built and socialized their 2019 roadmap
  •  Have contextualized their 2019 roadmap in OKR terms ("Review and reaffirm objectives on which your program roadmap has been built; review progress towards those objectives")
  •  Have produced (Are working on) their board report for July 17th board meeting
  •  Demonstrated evidence of staying on top of google groups moderation (both join requests and messages posted by those not in the respective google group already)
  •  As applicable, project/working group with eligibility criteria have 1) had them approved by the PMC, 2) published them on the site, and 3) are using them to review join requests to the mailing list
  •