Date

29 Jan 2016

Attendees

Present:

Time	Item	Objectives
20min	Board meeting outcomes	Gab to present outcomes of BOD
10min	New website	Don't advertise yet. Shown to the board. Still beta.
10min	Paragon / Minuet Contribution	Let's move forward, we probably need ICLA/CCLA for the differential. Just follow the contrib process Committers from GS + Symphony?
10min	Working groups	Ideas for working groups that came out at the BOD : security, devops, compliance, open source readiness, common api, content Creation process: Was it reviewed? Makes sense? Feedback?
10min	Question / recommendations / report for the Board?	Anything you'd like me to bring up next week

The meeting was adjourned to TBC.

This is a record of items to be completed by this meeting:

JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups
- Gabriele Columbro: check the same with other BOD members

Deferred discussions (ESCo backlog)

The following discussions have been deferred to the next meeting(s) - in decreasing priority order:

Gabriele Columbro: policies of electing ESCo members in staggered way
Does the ESCo approve the presence of a Foundation officer as ESCo member? (needs to be ratified at BOD level)
JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups
- Gabriele Columbro: check the same with other BOD members

Gabriele Columbro: share documentation and demo of the helpdesk - see CONTRIB-1
Gabriele Columbro: Send vote for Project Lifecycle
ESCO: Review Code contribution acceptance criteria for glaring missing point
john.stecher@barclays.com: John's team to connect with James Turck on Desktop/Wrapper API
ESCO: review Working Group creation process
JS/Gabriele Columbro: collaborate on acceptance criteria in Code Contribution Process (DRAFT) (or create new page)