2016-02-19 - ESCo - Meeting agenda / minutes

2016-02-19 - ESCo - Meeting agenda / minutes

Date

Jan 29, 2016

Attendees

Present:

 

Avatar

Member

Organization

Role

ESCo role

Lawrence Miller

Symphony LLC

EVP, Global Technology

Symphony Lead

Gabriele Columbro [Administrator]

Symphony Software Foundation

Executive Director

Secretary / Non Voting

Mike Harmon

Symphony LLC

CTO

Symphony Lead


Agenda / Minutes

Time

Item

Objectives

Comments

Decisions / Resolutions

10min

Review action items

 

 

 

10min

Paragon / Minuet Contribution

Do we want to open source it now or wait for the working group proceedings?

 

 

10min

Foundation officer non voting member of the ESCo

I am going to ratify it in the BOD meeting. Any issues with that?

 

 

10min

Working groups creation process?

Was it reviewed? Makes sense? Feedback?

 

 

10min

Question / recommendations / report for the Board?

Anything you'd like me to bring up next week

 

 

The meeting was adjourned to TBC.

This is a record of items to be completed by this meeting:

JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups

@Gabriele Columbro: check the same with other BOD members



Deferred discussions (ESCo backlog)

The following discussions have been deferred to the next meeting(s) - in decreasing priority order:

@Gabriele Columbro: policies of electing ESCo members in staggered way
Does the ESCo approve the presence of a Foundation officer as ESCo member? (needs to be ratified at BOD level)



Action items for next meeting

@Gabriele Columbro: share documentation and demo of the helpdesk
@Gabriele Columbro: Send vote for Project Lifecycle
@Gabriele Columbro: Send vote for project lifecycle 
ESCO: Review Code contribution acceptance criteria for glaring missing point
@john.stecher@barclays.com: John's team to connect with James Turck on Desktop/Wrapper API
 JS/@Gabriele Columbro: collaborate on acceptance criteria in Code Contribution Process (DRAFT) (or create new page)
JS: float the idea of ESCo divided in open source / architecture vs. standards working groups

@Gabriele Columbro: check the same with other BOD members