Mar 8, 2018

Add new action items here.

[Aaron joined and began taking notes a few minutes into the call.]

JS: Lawrence have you talked to Bruce further about Symphony supporting objects?

LM: I think that where we’ve gotten in terms of the basic structure of a financial object, we’re probably moving into a place where the business context where this stuff is being used is more important than the low-level architecture.

JS: Aaron, Peter had mentioned there’s some more interest from members in participating in the group?

AW: Yes, some of the larger members expressed an interest in getting significantly more involved, but we still need to coordinate with them to figure out how to get that started. I’d really like to put together an in-person meeting once we’ve got that sorted out now that the group is focused on more significant work products.

WQ: I think that’s a really good idea to get the larger group together to level-set and get everyone on the same page before pushing forward with the next bit of work.

JS: Ok. And in the meantime, I think it would be a good idea to get the RFQ subgroup going and start getting ideas down in the wiki about the work it will do.

WQ: I’m happy to take the lead on getting that group together. Can you send me the names of the initial participants?

JS: Yes, I’ll do that.