<not covered>

Specific responsibilities to be shared with the group.

• Discussion regarding Thursday's WG meeting
  • William Quan and Hammad Akbar have been working towards having the Trade and RFQ objects at a point where they're suitable for sharing with that wider group
  • Trade object is the priority, since it naturally "extends" to become an RFQ object
  • William Quan suggests not focusing on demos / UIs initially, since that tends to get bogged down in highly specific discussions around workflows (where they're triggered from, actioned, etc.)
• Driving broader participation in the WG
  • Johan Sandersson shared internally with the FactSet Portware team
  • Peter Monks shared with Blackrock & Citadel - some interest from Blackrock (Matthew Gardner), but no response yet from Citadel
  • Foundation also chasing up introductions to clearing house folks
  • DovK has come back with some names within MS too
  • Foundation is meeting AQR next week, and this is one of the topics
• Member's meeting presentation
  • Use of metrics dashboard to capture some of the stats
• FDC3 Use Cases WG
  • First use case relates to sell side equity trader, and that seems to fit the "Trade" object being discussed here.
  • This WG might codify the object and then provide that to the FDC3 WG?  Challenge is one of timing - they are running ahead with a "simplified" trade object that's going to require multiple transformations between parties.
  • Is there a reason to keep separate groups?  If so, there should be a common line of updates between the FDC3 and FO PMCs.