Meeting minutes status: Draft (pending approval)

Table of Contents

Date/Time

2018-06-11 11:00am US-Eastern

Attendees

Name	Organisation
Hammad Akbar	Citi
Johan Sandersson	FactSet
William Quan	JPMC
Peter Monks	FINOS

Outstanding Action Items

Description	Due date	Assignee	Task appears on
Hammad Akbar, William Quan: identify the PMC lead for the Program (like the Highlander, "there can be only one" )		Hammad Akbar	PMC Tasks
Hammad Akbar, William Quan: PMC meetings: complete the details of the PMC's meeting schedule and dial in information on the PMC page within the Program space		Hammad Akbar	PMC Tasks

Agenda

Time	Item	Who	Notes from the Meeting
5 min	Convene & roll call	Peter Monks (in lieu of PMC Lead)
10 min	Review action items from previous meetings (see above)	Peter Monks (in lieu of PMC Lead)	<not covered>
10 min	Appoint a PMC Lead	Peter Monks (on behalf of Program Liaison)	Specific responsibilities to be shared with the group.
45 min	AOB & adjourn	Peter Monks (in lieu of PMC Lead)	Discussion regarding Thursday's WG meeting William Quan and Hammad Akbar have been working towards having the Trade and RFQ objects at a point where they're suitable for sharing with that wider group Trade object is the priority, since it naturally "extends" to become an RFQ object William Quan suggests not focusing on demos / UIs initially, since that tends to get bogged down in highly specific discussions around workflows (where they're triggered from, actioned, etc.) Driving broader participation in the WG Johan Sandersson shared internally with the FactSet Portware team Peter Monks shared with Blackrock & Citadel - some interest from Blackrock (Matthew Gardner), but no response yet from Citadel Foundation also chasing up introductions to clearing house folks DovK has come back with some names within MS too Foundation is meeting AQR next week, and this is one of the topics Member's meeting presentation Use of metrics dashboard to capture some of the stats FDC3 Use Cases WG First use case relates to sell side equity trader, and that seems to fit the "Trade" object being discussed here. This WG might codify the object and then provide that to the FDC3 WG? Challenge is one of timing - they are running ahead with a "simplified" trade object that's going to require multiple transformations between parties. Is there a reason to keep separate groups? If so, there should be a common line of updates between the FDC3 and FO PMCs.

Decisions Made

Action Items

Hammad Akbar draft agenda for Thursday's WG meeting (here), and then email fo@finos.org to drum up interest for the call
William Quan to reach out to contacts at T Rowe Price re participation in the WG
Peter Monks to coordinate with Gabriele Columbro re getting Fidelity folks interested in the WG
William Quan to ensure Nicholas Kolba and Tim Kolecke have the invitation to the financial objects WG
Peter Monks to share PMC Lead responsibilities with Hammad Akbar and William Quan (who can then decide how they want to approach assignment of this responsibility)
Hammad Akbar, William Quan digest PMC Lead responsibilities and decide who will initially have the role

Browser not supported