Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minConvene & roll call



10 minReview action items from previous meetings


See above

30 minAPI specification: technical approach and timelineFormer user (Deleted), Lynn Neir (Deactivated), Jonathan ChristensenThe aim of this discussion is to: 1) agree on a technical approach to defining the API specification, based on the discussions that have taken place in the specification subgroup; 2) establish terms for cooperating with Symphony LLC; and 3) establish a timeline and milestones for defining the spec.
10 minDiscuss proposed revised charterFormer user (Deleted)

Former user (Deleted) has proposed that the first provision of the draft updated charter be revised as follows:

"The group will seek to define and standardize APIs required to integrate the Symphony HTML5 application into a desktop container, with a specific goal such that applications such as to enable Symphony might to be hosted in different containers/frameworks. Standardization may take the form of identifying the relevant standards (i.e. W3C standards) or authoring new standards as relevant."

5 minAOB & adjourn



Attendees

NameOrganisation
Credit Suisse
Jonathan ChristensenSymphony LLC
Andrew ChristieIpreo
Goldman Sachs
ScottLogic
Mark HuCiti
Brian IngenitoMorgan Stanley
OpenFin
Citadel
Symphony LLC
Symphony LLC
Ed SandersJP Morgan Chase
FactSet
Morgan Stanley
HSBC
Ryan SharpChartIQ
Tick42
Symphony Software Foundation
Symphony Software Foundation
Symphony Software Foundation

Meeting notes

James Turck: Going to ignore previous action items. The main item is API specification, approach and timeline. At the last WG meeting, there was a discussion about whether the approach we were taking to the specification was correct and whether we’d be driving to an answer quickly enough for the LLC to be able to use the spec. The topic was brought up again the board meeting, so the action I’d like to take is to agree, hopefully quickly, to the approach that we’re taking. It’s been suggested that instead of having a separate subgroup, we fold that into this one. So that’s the primary goal of this session. We also have the outstanding action of the revised charter, which I still intend to carve 10 minutes out at the end for. But first let’s try to agree on the approach and timeline, and hopefully get to some technical work.

...

Actions items from previous meetings

...